I would like to ask the Attorney General whether he would explain specifically to the House and to the house of the business community what is the relationship between these two clauses in the proclamation? I feel like it seemed to me. and Freund learned the member of the Liverpool Exchange Department, who spoke after 1000 municipalities in this house on the same day that Article 6 of the proclamation is directly at odds with the original clause. The Hon. and gentleman learned, the member of the Liverpool Exchange Division, spoke at last week`s debate. He said: – I say honestly that I have always said that reinsurance contracts are terminated. I think that is largely the view of many lawyers. For many of us, it seemed that Article 6 of this proclamation – provided the reinsurance company had a branch in London – and almost all of these German companies would move the business forward as if the proclamation had not taken place. My Hon. and a learned friend said that he wanted to draw the Attorney General`s attention to this, and that, in his view, the position was that section 6 of the proclamation should go away.
The Attorney General promised that he would deal with the matter and see what could be done. This afternoon, I will ask the Attorney General if he will deal with this issue. In India, the agreement with a minor is invalid of initio means cancelled from departure. In Mohri bibee v. Dhurmodas Ghose, the Privy Council held that “the law requires all contracting parties to be competent,” and the law provides, among other things, in Section 10 that a person who, because of his childhood, is unable to enter into a contract within the meaning of the law. There is another point on which I would like to seek the advice of the Attorney General. He also promised to deal with it before the time of the extension, and this is the last opportunity I have to ask for the right advice. and learned nice views on this other point, a little difficult – that`s the issue of reinsurance contracts with extraterrestrial insurance companies. I explained this question a week ago, and I will not go into that, other than to say that there are a large number – almost all – of our insurance companies that have reinsurance contracts with German companies and other foreign companies. What insurance companies want to know is their position on these contracts. In the proclamation issued a week ago, the question was apparently clear, as Article 5, subsection (6), stipulated that no insurance company should “take out or accept a new marine, life, fire or other policy policy, or a contract or insurance with or for the good of an enemy; not to accept or have insurance, a risk arising from an insurance policy (including reinsurance) that was contracted or benefited with an enemy before the outbreak of war. 1002 The other is a very difficult and important issue raised by the gentleman. He pointed out, and it is true, that in the minds of many people in the world of commerce, there are many doubts and uncertainties about the impact of the outbreak of war on their rights and commitments in contracts concluded before the start of the war.